In
class, we brought up an interesting question of whether the risk of climbing
Annapurna was worth it in the end. Then we compared this risk with other risks
that we take as average citizens. The book mentions that it is a tale of a “terrible
adventure” because even though they successfully summited Annapurna, they did
it at a significant cost. After losing several fingers to frostbite and
potentially not being able to mountain climb ever again, one may think that it
may have not been worth it and the risks should have been calculated more
carefully. For the “arm-chair” adventurer this risk-taking can be comparable to
decisions we make on occasion. For example, applying to graduate school can be compared
to summiting a mountain. Successfully reaching the summit can be comparable to
gaining acceptance to a graduate school. The grades, test scores,
recommendations, and work experience when submitting an application are
equivalent to the preparations required to climb a mountain that include map
preparation, assembling of a team, food preparation, etc. The risk can be
justified by the motivations and consequences undertaken when performing such a
feat. The motivations are caused by what a person values the most. Herzog’s
team placed a high value on the national recognition and the glory that would
come after successfully summiting Annapurna. For Herzog, another high value was
placed on the self-fulfillment achieved once on the summit of a mountain. We
can see that different values can lead to different motivations that can fuel
the ascent of a mountain. When applying to graduate school, if one solely
values gaining acceptance then a rejection can be heart-breaking, however, if
one can find importance in the application process or “the journey” then a
rejection can simply mean an opportunity to learn and make another attempt the
next year. By viewing the process as the “journey,” then one can be motivated
by different values and not just the end product.
When considering the
consequences/risks, it is important to consider that it is extremely difficult
to take into account all the risks until you are actually performing the act.
Herzog’s team prepared a decent amount when getting together a qualified team,
having a medical professional, and having enough food but no one can ever know
what is in store until the expedition has begun. In life, anything can happen
and any amount of preparation that is done can still not be enough. With this
in mind, the risk might just be worth it. When applying to a graduate program,
especially a highly competitive school, one never knows if the admissions
committee will accept an application until one has applied. Therefore, why not
make the leap of faith? By taking into account the different values someone
might hold and comparing them to the risks/costs involved, one can assess
whether or not a particular risky feat is worth doing. In this case, climbing
the mountain and applying to graduate are both risks that people can take and
depending on these factors a justification can be found.
No comments:
Post a Comment