The main difference between Blum and Herzog’s narratives
that struck me while reading Annapurna: A
Woman’s Place was how different the tone of each author was in terms of
describing their leadership and the decisions made over the course of the
expedition. Herzog’s narrative emphasized his decisions and the ways he guided
the expedition without paying a great deal of attention to the ways that the
members of his climbing team might have impacted the choices he made. Blum on
the other hand focused heavily on the opinions and influence that her team
members had on how she chose to lead and the decisions she made for the group.
Blum’s narrative implies that she had a much more team focused approach to her
expedition, and she spoke frequently about her desire to have a good team
dynamic and her hopes that everyone would get along throughout the course of
the expedition.
I think that Blum chose to tell the story of her expedition
from a very honest perspective that explored all of the elements that went into
completing the expedition from her personal thoughts to the influence of her
team to the role of the sherpas. Herzog, on the other hand decided to focus
more on the concrete elements of the expedition, spending time describing the
more technical climbs rather than group dynamics. For both author’s, each
person chosen for the expedition was to occupy a unique and integral role. I
felt like Blum allowed the reader to get to know each participant on a personal
level that Herzog left out of his book. Herzog focused on practical skills and
contributions of each team member, whereas Blum also stressed the importance of
understanding the challenges each woman faced, the concerns they had, and the
ways this influenced her decisions as a leader.
Both Herzog and Blum had a larger goal in mind; Herzog and
his team climbing for France, and Blum and her team climbing more generally for
women everywhere. I think this is reflected in their narratives, with Herzog
portraying an almost colonialist attitude designed to reflect their desire to
“conquer” the mountain, and Blum attempting to show readers the physical and
mental ability of women to take part in these expeditions. I don’t think one is
better than the other, but rather they had different goals for their books, and
their expeditions more broadly.
No comments:
Post a Comment