Krakauer’s description of Mount
Everest raises two interesting complaints about the commercialization of
mountaineering especially with regards to Everest and the Seven Summits. Not
does commercialization reduce the prestige of having summated these mountains,
but also increases the risk associated with these climbs.
In
all three of the readings we have completed before Into Thin Air the
protagonists were attempting to some how be the first to accomplish their
goals. Krakauer found a new route
up the Devils Thumb, Herzog was the first to summit Annapurna, and Blum led the
first women’s expedition up Annapurna.
It is very important to these climbers that they are the first to
accomplish their tasks.
Furthermore in the case of Krakauer and Blum, it is important that only
a few people have summated their peak before them. However when dozens of people climb Everest each year the
climb loses its prestige. The
prestige of the climb is further weakened as the skill level required to summit
decreases. Krakauer notes that
many of the climbers on hall’s expedition as well as others did not have much
mountaineering experience. The
most interesting examples of this are Sandy Pittman and Beck Weathers. Pittman
is described as carrying as much computer and electronic equipment climbing
gear. This “high style” form of
climbing is significantly less adventurous or extreme as Herzog’s ascent.
Furthermore, Weathers is described as having less-than-mediocre mountaineering skills.
This is much different than Herzog and Blum’s expeditions, which are both
described as highly experienced and skilled. If a Dallas pathologist and a New
York socialite can both climb Mount Everest than does that diminish the
accomplishments of experienced climbers who summit Everest.
The
influx of inexperienced climbers also raises another question, do these
climbers create unsafe conditions for others on the mountain. This is most
clear in Krakauer’s discussions of the South African expedition and Taiwanese
expedition. Krakauer describes the
South African expedition and more specifically their leader Ian Woodall as
being reckless, inexperienced, and inconsiderate. This is clear when Krakauer’s
writes, that on hearing the South African’s would attempt to summit at the same
time as Hall’s expedition Hall stated “I don’t want to be anywhere near the
upper mountain when those punters are up there” (Chapter 10). Krakauer shows the same concern about
the Taiwanese’s lack of experience. He writes, “The presence of the Taiwanese
on Everest was a matter of grave concern” (Chapter 7). He states that other
expeditions were concerned that, due to the Taiwanese’s inexperience, they may
be require to give up their summit attempts and even put their own lives in
danger in the event that the Taiwanese needed assistance. The increase in
climbers on Everest, and more specifically the increase of facilitated routs up
the mountain allows much weaker climbers to attempt to summit the mountain and
could potentially put other climbers at risk.
While the two expeditions I noted
were not commercial expeditions it is clear that they are largely able to
attempt to summit due to the commercialization of Everest. Commercial
expeditions are helping to create a safer climbing environment. Fixed ropes are
able to used by all the expeditions. This is especially clear in the case of
the Icefall, which in Mal Duff maintained 1996 and those who passed through
compensated him. This sort of operation would not be possible without high
numbers of expeditions but also makes it possible for highly unskilled climbers
to pass through.
One final benefit of the
commercialization of climbing mountains like Everest is that they allow skilled
climbers to climb without having to worry about logistics. This is largely the case with members
of Fisher and duff’s expeditions including Pete Schoening, Charlotte Fox, and Veikka
Gustaffsson. All three of these climbers have successfully summated 8,000-meter
mountains and could likely lead their own Everest expedition however commercial
expeditions allow them to climb without worrying about logistical issues. Looking
towards the end of this narrative, and knowing it ends in tragedy, it will be
interesting to see if Krakauer comes to a conclusion about weather the increase
in climbers on Everest is a good or bad thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment