While reading the first half of Herzog’s Annapurna, I couldn’t help but wonder
why I was interested in the book. Normally I enjoy the complex characters and
riveting plots of traditional fiction. But something about this book is holding
my interest, despite the late hour. Although Herzog’s fellow climbers certainly
are characters, since they are real people, and people are rarely static, we
see no deliberate character development because Herzog isn’t making up a story
for us, he’s retelling an experience as he remembers it. Thus his friends are
characters in some sense, but we see little of their quirks and style compared
to what we’d see from carefully calculated storylines.
The first third or so of
the book was taken up with exploration. It was not until about chapters 9 and
10 that we really saw the beginning of the telling of the reason for the party’s
journey in the first place: climbing a big mountain. So why did the book keep
my attention throughout the first 8 chapters of try something, fail, try
something else, fail. Lose hope, keep trying, tentative success. My cliché
answer is somewhere along the lines of “It’s in the journey.” As we discovered
with Krakauer’s story about the Devil’s Thumb, once you get to the summit it’s
the end of the adventure in terms of uncertainty of success and reaching the
top and unknown land to traverse. Thus it would make sense logistically for the
story to be mostly of the journey, but again, why does this fascinate us?
This comes back to the point of one of the focal points of
the course – why do people write adventure narratives and why are they so
wildly popular? I think that the cleansing / sobering experience of an
adventure / a climb (see Deandra’s previous post "Why Climb?" for more) is something that
everyone longs for, and something that not everyone gets a chance to
experience. In fact, I’d say most people don’t get to have such fabulous and
challenging adventures as climbing icy Himalayan mountains. Thus we as a
comfort-bound audience must content ourselves with experiencing this through
another’s eyes. I think this definitely takes away from going through the
adventure oneself, and having one’s own adventure instead of someone else's, but at the same time, I also
think it’s a satisfactory substitute for the less fortunate/brave/insane. So in
some sense, I guess we’re settling by reading adventure narratives. Thoughts?
No comments:
Post a Comment