One significant difference between The Narrative
of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket and the other adventure narratives we have
read is the main agents level of unpreparedness. In other
stories we have read the main agents knowingly engage in activities they
understand to be dangerous. Mountain climbers know the danger associated with
mountains and arctic expeditions understand there is risk of getting
stranded. Considering this
knowledge the adventurers can adequately prepare. On the other hand, Augustus and Pym seem highly unprepared. Augustus and Pym are armchair adventurers who
devise a plan to go out on a whaling ship. However, despite their knowledge of adventures they do not
seem to consider the risks. As a result of the mutiny and subsequent events
Augustus, Pym, Peters, and Parker are left truly ill equipped for survival in
the ocean. In other stories the
crews have had sufficient supplies to last their journey or offer the
adventurers a good chance of survival.
On the other hand, those aboard the Grampus are so desperate for food
that they turn to cannibalism and sacrifice Parker. This
story also differs from many other adventure narratives in that it details many
adventures that are part of a larger adventure rather than a single-minded
adventure. In vertical adventures
the goal is to reach the summit. In the arctic adventures we have read the goal
of the characters was to escape and survive. In this narrative Pym’s goal changes numerous times. First Pym is a stowaway, then he is
trying to retake a ship, then he attempts to sail through storms. All of these adventures have an
isolated feel but also contribute to the overall narrative. The narrative could
easily have ended when the Jane Guy rescues Pym and Peters however Poe chose to
continue and extend the narrative.
No comments:
Post a Comment