After
reading the introductory chapter of the drunken adventure with Augustus on the
Ariel, I was initially confused as to why this had been included (other than to
grab the reader with a hint of excitement and fear). Rather than curb his
desire to adventure and thrill, this near-death experience only adds fuel to
the fire: “It might be supposed that a catastrophe such as I have just related
would have effectually cooled my incipient passion for the sea. On the
contrary, I never experienced a more ardent longing for the wild adventures
incident to the life of a navigator than within a week after our miraculous
deliverance.” (pg. 13) How could Pym’s experience in the Ariel not leave a
lasting impact? Moreover, why follow Augustus onto the Grampus? However, the
farther I read into The Narrative of
Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket, the clear purpose of including the story
became clear. This chapter highlights how Pym exaggerates/embellishes the
details of his story, and led me to question the reliability of the narrator. This
chapter also demonstrated some of the more implausible and unrealistic elements
of the story. While it seems impossible for these two shit-faced sailors to
survive their voyage, incredibly both are saved - even Augustus who was drunk
as a skunk and had to be tied upright. C’mon!
No comments:
Post a Comment