Throughout all of the books we’ve
read we’ve touched upon the idea of what it means to write about an event after
it happens; how the story becomes manipulated in hindsight. While reading
through the book up until the point where Simpson and Yates actually start climbing, I couldn’t
help but feel like he was artificially trying to invoke a sense of dread in the
reader from the very first pages. Very early on he mentions that he felt “spasms
of fear” (25) and “a sharp strong sense of danger” (31), which to me implied
that he knew from the start that something was going to go wrong. It felt like
overplayed foreshadowing while I was reading it.
The other
books that we have read have highlighted the fact that every single small occurrence
and decision can have enormous consequences, and once Simpson and Yates began
to climb it was clear that the frightening, smaller events leading up to the
disaster were important signs of danger. That being said, I think the other
books allowed me to develop a sense of dread and impending doom just by explaining
the facts, and as I was reading I felt like Simpson was using his writing to
manipulate my emotions in the early pages by referencing his feeling that
something bad was going to happen, rather than let them develop naturally by
reading his description of the events and his fears as they were happening.
Once the
climbing actually began I think Simpson did a great job of capturing the events
leading up to and following his injury. I like the way that he juxtaposed his
writing with Yates’ narrative. My criticism lies in the fact that I think I
would have more naturally developed an emotional response to what I was reading
once he started describing the climb, and felt like the foreshadowing was
overdone in the first few pages of the book.
No comments:
Post a Comment