Throughout this semester different
authors have taken very different approaches to their narratives. One approach I have found to be really
effective is opening each chapter with an epigraph. Barrett chose to take this
approach with The Voyage of the Narwhal. Approaching this book I knew very
little about sailing and arctic travel. These epigraphs helped to set the
emotional and natural backdrop for Barrett’s story. Krakauer also took this approach with Into Thin Air. In both cases I felt that by carefully choosing
quotes what applied to the chapter I was able to better understand what the
author was trying to say.
Another thing that stood out to me
about this story was the idea that no one writes about failures. This struck me
as a very accurate statement. We have read a number of stories about troubled
expeditions or lesser victories, however none of these expeditions have truly
failed. The two Annapurna expeditions experienced difficulties and losses
however they met their primary objective. The only expedition that may be
considered a failure is the Everest expedition in Into Thin Air. There
is a big difference between failure and challenges. At first when I read that no one writes about failures, I
thought that our readings thus far were perfect counter examples. However, on
further thoughts most of the expeditions we have read about are clear examples
of successful expiations, which met challenges.
I think you're right to wonder about the failures. To me it brings us back to the question we always seem to ask about what makes an adventure narrative? How do you define a failure? Is it not reaching the summit? is it losing people on the expedition? I feel like it's one of those questions that we'll come back to again.
ReplyDelete