I
have to say, my first reaction at the end of Stickeen was relief because for some odd reason I was convinced
that Stickeen was going to die, or get in some traumatic accident. I’m not sure
if that simply stemmed from the title being “Stickeen” as, as commemorated a
long lost friend. But I guess, at its essense, that’s exactly what Muir’s
narrative does. We have talked a lot in class about how to define ‘adventure’.
(actually we haven’t really discussed it much but we have talked about how we
are going to talk about it quite a few times) Stickeen seemed to me almost more
like an ideal adventure TV show for outdoorsy children. But looking at the text objectively,
there is no reason why this is not just as much an adventure as all the other
texts we have read. Muir, solo aside from the beloved dog, gets in a near-death
predicament, where one misstep could easily have led to his death and
Stickeen’s either death or abandonment. So I tried to figure out why this text
struck a different chord for me.
I came to the conclusion that it was simply because of the truthful
fantasy of a dog as “man’s best friend” since I was a little child. At least
for me, books with animals are just more appealing. I guess it’s because we
hope to read literature in order to understand or be transported to somewhere
we would not otherwise be. The idea of obtaining the unattainable becomes very
real in literature. Now here is a story with a relationship, unspoken yet very
clear, between man and dog that is, in effect, true. Yes, we have discussed how
we cannot take each of the writers’ words literally, because for all we know
they could have made the whole thing up. But still, it’s a lot more truthful
that Clifford.
At the end of the narrative, Muir states,
“His (Stickeen’s) fate is wrapped in mystery. Doubtless he has left this
world—crossed the last crevasse—and gone to another. But he will not be
forgotten. To me Stickeen is immortal.” (Muir, 7) By writing this essay,
Stickeen becomes immortal to readers too. But the interesting part is that
Stickeen himself, not Muir nor the Glacier, becomes the legend. He is the
equivalent of the Myolangsangma In Touching
My Father’s Soul, except he is tangible; readers can compare him to their
own dogs. All in all, to me, this was still an adventure narrative, but it
changed my view on how I would describe adventure narratives. More than any
other text we have read, this seemed not to matter where it took place, in fact
I had to look back to see that it was in Alaska. Overall, this just made me
miss my dogs. Every time I walk in the glen I think how they would be in
paradise then. I wonder, though, how would my huge German Shepherd and little Golden
Retriever do on a glacier?
It definitely made me think at least a little more about how my dog and I would fare together on a glacier in Alaska. (Not well, to say the least.) But I did find that I was able to compare Stickeen to my own dog. I thought this text was easy to relate to because of the feelings I have toward my own dog on some occasions. I like to imagine what she's thinking and how she would respond to an event even as mundane as getting food poured in her dog bowl. Plus she's pretty cute and fluffy.
ReplyDeleteThere are some people that happen to stick in your mind because of a memory you had with them, even if the time you spent with them was fleeting. This is one of those cases.